| Interview with Brooks Tegler |
|
|
|
|
Marc Myers: "My first encounter with drummer Brooks Tegler happened about a year ago, when a CD called That's It! arrived in an envelope. I was about to toss it onto the “maybe” pile when my eye spotted Pussy Willow in the CD's play list. I thought to myself, "Who in their right mind would take on Bill Finegan’s impossibly nuanced swinger for Tommy Dorsey’s post-war band?" So I popped on Pussy Willow. Not only was the execution flawless but also the entire album was solid. That was then. Now Brooks has just released Uncommon Denominator, his small group tribute to the big band era. The result is equally smart and tasteful.
Brooks also is about grace. Tracks on the new album include such rarely heard numbers as Pam, Opus ½ and Black Market Stuff as well as ear-catchers like Easy Living, The Lady’s in Love, Speak Low and Frenesi. The musicians in Brooks' band also share the passion. Among the many standout soloists are Scott Silbert on tenor sax and Joe Midiri on clarinet and alto sax. To give you an idea of how much thought went into each I spoke with Brooks late last week: JazzWax: So Benny Carter is the album's “uncommon denominator." Strange choice for a drummer, no? Brooks Tegler: Not really. Benny showed volumes of taste and good sense in everything he played and wrote. I can’t think of anything that Benny recorded that anyone can take issue with. He's a hero. BT: Benny had so much influence on the era's big bands and small groups in terms of his phrasing, note choices and chords. It’s Benny's elegance that’s so special. I equate him with my other big heroes of the 1940s, the Tuskegee Airmen, the African-American flyers. These guys had huge battles to fight and had nothing to prove. They were very cool, graceful men. JW: Your last album was a big band tribute. Why small groups now? BT: Most of the big bands of the 1930s and 1940s had small groups within them. Each band had major players JW: How do you ensure the authenticity of your executions? BT: I’m constantly wrestling with this issue when choosing songs and arrangements. The way I've managed to avoid the trap is the same way someone who studies art avoids it. If you're a painter, you try to get into the nuts and bolts of how masterpieces were painted. Then you interpret the fundamental lessons. It's the same here. What we're doing is paying tribute to the way these bands played, not trying to sound like them. This requires a deeper understanding of why the musicians played the way they did back then. BT: The expressive way the bands worked had a lot to do with the fact that the music was new. They had had a lot to say and prove. They were anxious to show audiences what they could do and say with music. Showmanship and physical endurance played a big role in the sound because these bands were designed to perform almost nightly. Lionel Hampton, of course, exemplified this. The same is true of many drummers from the period. JW: How does the physical component translate into the music's sound? BT: The energy has to resonate. Hampton was highly JW: How did you pull this off? BT: By having a clear understanding of the historical counterparts, which gives you an understanding of what they did and how you can do it, too. If you get into the staid, boring, production-line trap of playing nostalgia, the execution will fall flat. There’s no love in that. It’s just a job. JW: Who's your favorite drummer of the period? BT: Gene Krupa. That’s because of the man himself and JW: In your mind, what specifically makes Krupa special? BT: Gene on the drums didn't just keep time—he played the song with his sticks. Take Lover, for example, Ed Finckel's arrangement from the mid-1940s. Listen to Gene's JW: Give me another example of Krupa's melodic style. BT: Listen to the transcription of Benny Goodman's band JW: As a bandleader, how do you find and hold onto musicians who also understand the big band era? BT: I’m lucky that I’m based in Washington, D.C., where there are many military jazz bands. A number of the guys in my band are in the service. Interestingly, there's a passion in D.C. for the music of World War II, so many musicians come to me asking to join. You have to find guys who really love this music. It's more than just playing notes on a page. JW: You're a big Glenn Miller fan. BT: Yes—Artie Shaw and Benny Goodman, too. Of all of JW: What separates Miller, Basie or any of the leaders back then from later bandleaders? BT: The guys in the 1930s and 1940s had an idea for a sound. And they succeeded in popularizing the sound through drive and determination. Miller had an idea, to use a Ray Noble clarinet lead style. But Miller also was smart enough to know there were arrangers like Jerry Gray and Bill Finegan—guys who could take his music and sound, and put it on paper for the band. JW: What are your favorite Miller recordings? BT: Probably Snafu Jump, recorded by Miller’s Army Air JW: How do you keep from being overly romantic about this era? BT: You have to know the history. It’s easy to look back JW: What do you love so much about this era? BT: I love this period for its innocence. Through this innocence there was a lot more class. People were JW: What’s next? BT: On April 18th I’m bringing a 17-piece big band to JW: No Modernaires? BT: [Laughs] It’s very difficult to find singers here who can pull off that material with credibility. It was a lot harder to do than it seems on the records. The best vocal ensemble I know for this is led by Belgian trombonist Jack Coenen. The band is called The Jack Million Band and vocal group is called The Millionaires. One day they’ll come over and we’ll put the two halves together.
On the author: < read the full article on : http://www.jazzwax.com/2009/04/interview-brooks-tegler.html> |
| Next > |
|---|
Main Menu
| Home |
| The Band |
| Jack Coenen |
| Ballroom |
| Shows |
| Feedback |
| Media |
| News |
| CD releases |
| Contact Us |
| Links |




